050316  米国の温暖化対策、州レベルで進む自動車排ガス規制強化: メリーランド州の場合

 
度々お伝えするように、米国ではブッシュ大統領率いる共和党政権は温暖化防止や排出規制に消極的ですが、それとは対照的に、カリフォルニア州を筆頭とする各州レベル、とくに東部の7州(ニューヨーク、ニュージャージー、メイン、ロードアイランド、コネチカット、ヴァーモント、マサチューセッツ州)では、カリフォルニア方式の厳しい自動車排ガス規制を実施しております。最近、メリーランド州にも同様な動きがあり、目下同州議会で当該法案が審議中ですが、同法が実施されれば州民は高い自動車を買わされるとの反対派の主張に対して、Washington Postは社説で、メリーランドの大気汚染は極めて悪い状況にあり、少々車の値段が上がっても規制強化は必要だ、今行動しなければ将来はもっと高くつく(the price of inaction is higher)として、擁護しております。ちなみに同法の適用は2009年からで、この年からカリフォルニアその他関係諸州で売られる自動車の一定パーセンテージは、排ガス規制基準を満たした新型自動車(低公害車)でなければならないとされています。ご参考まで。
--KK
 
*********************************************************
 
 
Cleaner Cars in Maryland

Tuesday, March 15, 2005; Page A22

SEVEN STATES have adopted California's automobile emissions standards, which are tougher than those of the federal government, and Maryland lawmakers are considering a bill that would follow suit. Many car dealers oppose the legislation, fearing it would add to the price of new cars and cost them business. Environmentalists, citing polls, insist that Maryland drivers are willing to pay more for cars if they are able to recoup the cost over time through better mileage. To sweeten the chances of passage, the environmentalists have attached an amendment that would allow a future governor -- without consulting the legislature -- to opt out of the bill's emission requirements if they were causing car prices to soar. In all the back and forth, it is possible to lose sight of the fact that Maryland's air quality is poor and unhealthful and that vehicle exhaust is one of the principal culprits. That's why the General Assembly should enact the Clean Cars Act.

The bill is facing key committee votes in the state House and Senate, and fence-sitting lawmakers are being subjected to a barrage of technical-sounding position papers from both sides. Among the criticisms from those opposed to the legislation is that it would make Maryland's regulation subject to decisions in Sacramento. That argument has a fine populist ring -- Maryland for Marylanders! -- but it overlooks the fact that the federal government has dragged its feet in cutting pollutants from auto emissions, leaving ecologically minded states little choice. Seven states -- New York, New Jersey, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Vermont and Massachusetts -- have followed California's lead because it offers the option of tougher standards.

If passed and signed by Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., the legislation would take effect in the 2009 automobile model year, at which point a certain percentage of cars and trucks sold in the state would have to be low-emissions vehicles. In the first phase, the law would affect smog and toxic chemicals; the second phase, which would take effect gradually with full implementation in 2016, would require that vehicles produce fewer greenhouse gases, which scientists believe contribute to global warming. Tougher emissions requirements would be reflected in higher sticker prices, though no one knows for sure how much higher. But for the environment and public health, the price of inaction is higher.