050330  Re: 米国による対パキスタンF-16戦闘機売却に異議あり: NYTimesの社説

 
ブッシュ大統領によるパキスタンへのF-16戦闘機の売却決定は、色々な波紋を呼んでおりますが、New York Timesは本日の社説で、パキスタンの対タリバン作戦での協力に報いる方法は、戦闘機の売却以外にあるのではないか、これまで15年間禁止してきた対パ戦闘機輸出を今ここで実施すればインド亜大陸の軍備拡張競争に油を注ぐのは必死で、しかも他の国に、核兵器開発を行っても罰せられないという誤ったメッセージを送ることになり、国際核不拡散体制にも大きなダメージとなる、と力説しています。さて、しかし、米国の軍産複合体の結束は固く、ブッシュ政権の対テロ戦争という錦の御旗の下で、対パ武器輸出は着々と実現の方法に動いているようです。ご参考まで。
--KK
 
********************************************
 
 
EDITORIAL

Fuel for South Asia's Arms Race


Published: March 29, 2005

The United States has far better ways to reward Pakistan for its helpful but selective pressure on Al Qaeda and the Taliban than President Bush's decision last week to break with 15 years of policy and sell Pakistan high-performance fighters whose only plausible use is to threaten India. Balancing those sales by offering New Delhi the chance to purchase, and perhaps build, similar planes doesn't lessen the damage of the Pakistan sale. It compounds it. The worst thing for these two nuclear powers, which have fought three wars against each other since 1947, is to encourage them to engage in a new, American-fueled arms race.

The United States does have a compelling strategic interest in helping Pakistan. But the right kind of help does not consist of selling Pakistan's armed forces, led by the country's military dictator, President Pervez Musharraf, prestigious, expensive and dangerous weapons systems. Decades of swollen military budgets have virtually bankrupted Pakistan, leaving its government unable to afford adequate spending on education and job-creating economic modernization. Instead, its leaders have fed the Pakistani people a diet of belligerent nationalism and projects like nuclear weapons that are designed to enhance a sense of prestige.

In this environment, civilian democracy has never struck deep roots, military takeovers have been common, and recruitment for a variety of groups preaching armed Islamist jihad has thrived. General Musharraf likes to advertise his occasional attacks on the most terrifying symptoms of this syndrome. He is far less willing to strike at its sources by pushing Pakistan toward development and democracy and far too eager to drain its resources on supersonic attack jets.

In reviewing the new Pakistan arms sale policy, which overturns a 15-year-old ban imposed over concerns about Pakistani nuclear weapons activity, Congress should think hard about the messages the United States wants to send to future proliferators. Pakistan developed nuclear weapons of its own after refusing to sign international nonproliferation treaties. Worse, it has spread nuclear weapons technology to Iran, North Korea, Libya and who knows what other countries, through the rogue network that was run by its top government nuclear scientist, A. Q. Khan. When Dr. Khan's activities became public a little over a year ago, he was pardoned by Pakistan's government, which conveniently avoided embarrassing revelations about any help he might have received from allies in the Pakistani military.

Advocates of these military sales will argue, as they always do, that if the United States did not sell Pakistan and India advanced fighter jets, other countries would. That is probably true, but it is not a justification for fueling an arms race. One big reason both governments want to buy American planes is to advertise to their own people and the world that their costly military spending enjoys the full backing of Washington. That alone is reason enough to regret Mr. Bush's decision.